Ten Minutes In, He Put the Translation App Away
A British project manager flew to China for a three-day stretch of meetings. He came over-prepared. Offline translation apps: downloaded. Meeting templates: printed. He had budgeted roughly seventy-two hours of smiling politely while a phone did the talking for him.
He lasted ten minutes.
Not because the Chinese team’s English was bad, although by the standards of his old school in Surrey it was catastrophic. Tenses drifting. Articles missing. Pronunciation that had never once been within a hundred miles of London. And yet, he wrote in a post that travelled fast across overseas platforms, every sentence arrived in his head with the precision of a laser-etched barcode.
The Chinese manager opened with this: “Yesterday I discussed already. Today we just cut phone.” Meaning: we covered this yesterday, today we only confirm. No past perfect. No articles. No decorative load-bearing beams.
The line that made his post go viral came next. Emails from his British colleagues, he said, are beautifully structured, immaculately punctuated, and usually take two readings to decode. That Chinese sentence, wrong in four places, took him half a second.
His conclusion: in a real meeting with real deadlines, Chinglish wins.
The replies split along a predictable line. Grammar teachers objected. Project managers, freight forwarders, factory engineers and anyone who has run a call with three time zones on it did not. They had all, at some point, been the person who just needed the number.
First, Why Chinese English Sounds Like That
If you have never studied Chinese, the shortest explanation is this: Chinese has no articles, no plural -s, no verb conjugation. Time is handled by context and a few small particles like le and guo. So “yesterday I discussed already” is not a sloppy translation of a Chinese sentence. It is an almost literal one. 昨天已经讨论过了 has no tense ending to add, because 已经 and 过 already did the work.
Map that onto English vocabulary and the grammar English insists on simply does not show up. It is not laziness or ignorance. It is a different machine wearing English words.
For an English speaker, that feels like driving a car with the dashboard warning lights removed. For a Chinese speaker, the lights were never the point. The road is the point.
This matters, because the people breaking the rules in these meetings usually know exactly which rule they are breaking. Chinese students spend years on English grammar, arguably more than British students do. The manager dropping articles in a Tuesday meeting is not confused about articles. He is triaging. The sentence has a job in the next twenty minutes, and the job is not decoration.
Chinglish as a Low-Latency Protocol
Before you write this off as one tired expat having a moment, look at the version of the argument that spread furthest, a long post attributed to a translator who has worked in international settings.
English, the argument goes, carries enormous grammatical overhead. Tense markers. Singular-plural agreement. Articles. Prepositions. Auxiliaries. By that translator’s rough accounting, something like 30 percent of the bandwidth in an ordinary English sentence is spent transmitting not content but rules: when it happened, how many of them, whether the noun was the specific one or just a noun. That is information, technically. It is also a tax.
Chinese English, in this telling, charges no tax. It is not really English at all. It is a Chinese-language operating system running on English vocabulary: high concurrency, low latency, no small talk.
Is 30 percent a real number? Probably not. Does the underlying observation feel familiar to anyone who has sat through a bilingual meeting? Yes. That is why it travelled.
The Huaqiangbei Test
Try it somewhere with money on the table. In Shenzhen’s Huaqiangbei, the densest cluster of electronics stalls on earth, walk up to a vendor and ask, in careful textbook English:
“Excuse me, what is the minimum order quantity for this item?”
Grammatically flawless. He may not even look up.
Now try: “You want how money?”
Not how much. How money. Watch his eyes change. Watch a price land on a calculator screen in under two seconds. What happened is that you skipped the politeness, the hedging, the embedded clause, and arrived at the only data point both of you actually need: the number.
One of those is a poetry recital. The other is a data transfer. In a market, the second one pays rent.
Where Nobody Says “Would You Mind”
The harder version of this test happens on Chinese-built infrastructure projects in Europe, where site engineers arrive from China, Ethiopia, India, the Philippines and elsewhere, and the accents stack up like scaffolding.
Instructions still never get lost. “No clock. Concrete arrive. You ready?” No conditional. No subjunctive. No softening verbs. Everyone nods. Everyone moves. The concrete arrives.
Anyone who has worked a Chinese domestic site will recognise the logic. A bricklayer from Sichuan and a carpenter from Fujian cannot understand each other’s dialect at all, and they still build a straight wall. They are not matching languages. They are matching the lowest common layer underneath: is it level, is it square, do we pour now.
The Words That Already Got In
There is a version of this argument with hard evidence attached, and it is sitting in your dictionary. “Long time no see” was, for decades, the phrase foreigners used to mock Chinese English. It is now standard informal English. It appears in dictionaries, in film scripts, in texts sent by people who have never met a Chinese person. “No can do.” “Lose face.” Same story.
Nobody noticed the day these crossed over. They just started saying them.
There is an honest caveat, though. Chinese English is not one thing, and it is not permanent. Young professionals in Shanghai and Shenzhen increasingly slide between registers: loose, fast Chinglish with their own teams, careful formal English with the client who is grading them. That is code-switching, not incompetence. The stripped-down version survives exactly where it is useful, and gets parked where it is not.
Grammar Is the Garnish. The Meal Is Getting It Done
Nobody is arguing that you should skip grammar. Write a contract, a thesis or a note to your landlord, and grammar is the only thing standing between you and a very expensive misunderstanding. Chinese English speakers spend years in classrooms on it, like everyone else.
The claim is narrower and slightly uncomfortable: being able to say the thing in a way the other person can act on beats being able to say it beautifully, in almost every place where work actually happens. The trading desk in Shanghai gets it. The vendor in Huaqiangbei gets it. The Ethiopian engineer standing in the rain on a project outside Warsaw gets it.
Language was never a museum piece with perfect syntax behind glass. It is a tool people use to build things, and tools get optimised by the people holding them. That is why “long time no see” is in the dictionary, and why a Chinese manager can walk into a meeting run by a British company, break four rules in one sentence, and still be the only person in the room who is completely understood.
Start the discussion at forum.chinacomes.com